Articles

Forensic Updates

An Overview of the Advantages of Kinship Care Versus Foster Placement in Children

Dr. Sam Goldstein

Introduction

I have been asked numerous times to testify about the significant differences and advantages of kinship care compared to traditional foster placement in child welfare cases. In this month's Forensic Update, I summarize the foundation of my testimony. This summary highlights the compelling evidence from numerous studies that support the benefits of placing children with relatives rather than in non-relative foster care settings. Kinship care has emerged as a preferred option due to its positive impact on stability, mental health, and familial connections for children. This overview examines the various advantages of kinship care, supported by peer-reviewed research.

Stability and Continuity

Stability in Placements: Children in kinship care generally experience fewer placement disruptions than those in foster care. Rubin et al. (2008) found that children with kinship care had significantly lower placement instability rates. Living with relatives provides a sense of familiarity and security, reducing the trauma associated with frequent moves that are more common in foster care settings. The sense of continuity that comes from living with family can play a crucial role in a child's development, offering emotional and psychological stability that supports healthier outcomes.

Continuity of Relationships: Kinship care enables children to maintain relationships with their family members and community, crucial for preserving their cultural and familial identity. Cuddeback (2004) found that these ongoing connections help maintain a sense of normalcy and continuity, often disrupted when children enter non-relative foster care. Maintaining these connections helps children feel a sense of belonging and identity, which is critical for their emotional and social development.

Mental and Emotional Well-being

Psychological Outcomes: Children placed in kinship care often exhibit better mental health outcomes compared to those in foster care. Winokur, Holtan, and Batchelder (2014) conducted a meta-analysis demonstrating that children in kinship care had fewer behavioral problems and better overall mental health. Emotional support from known caregivers who share a familial bond plays a significant role in these positive outcomes. This familiarity helps to mitigate the stress and trauma associated with being removed from their homes.

Sense of Belonging: Kinship caregivers are more likely to provide a sense of belonging and identity, which is critical for a child's self-esteem and emotional development. The pre-existing bonds and familiarity with their caregivers help mitigate feelings of abandonment and loss, which are common in traditional foster care settings (Pabustan-Claar, 2007). Children in kinship care often feel more secure and valued, knowing they are with family members who care about them and their well-being.

Educational Outcomes

Academic Performance: Research indicates that children in kinship care often perform better academically. Zinn et al. (2012) found that children in kinship care had fewer school changes, contributing to better academic performance and higher graduation rates. The stability and support from family members create a conducive learning environment, often lacking in more transient foster care situations. Children who remain in the same school can build consistent relationships with teachers and peers, which supports their academic progress and social development.

Legal and Systemic Perspectives

Legal Stability: Kinship care arrangements often lead to more permanent legal outcomes, such as guardianship or adoption by relatives. This legal stability benefits the child's long-term well-being. It provides a sense of permanency less frequently achieved in non-relative foster care (Testa, 2001). Permanent legal arrangements such as guardianship or adoption by relatives ensure that children have stable and long-term caregiving arrangements, which is beneficial for their overall development and well-being.

Systematic Benefits: Kinship care can alleviate the burden on the foster care system by providing a viable alternative for children who cannot remain with their biological parents. This can help reduce the number of children in the foster care system, allowing for more focused attention on those who stay (Geen, 2003). Child welfare agencies can better allocate resources and improve outcomes for all children by utilizing family networks. Kinship care not only supports the children placed in these arrangements but also strengthens the foster care system by reducing the strain on resources and services.

Challenges and Considerations

While kinship care offers numerous advantages, it also presents challenges. Kinship caregivers may face financial and emotional strain, and not all relatives are prepared or willing to take on the responsibility of full-time caregiving. Therefore, child welfare systems must provide adequate support and resources to kinship caregivers to ensure the success of these placements. According to Gibbs and Muller (2000), providing financial assistance, training, and access to support services can help mitigate these challenges and improve the sustainability of kinship care. Ensuring that kinship caregivers have the support they need is crucial for the long-term success of these placements.

Financial Support: Many kinship caregivers are grandparents or other relatives who may be living on fixed incomes. Financial support can help alleviate the economic burden of caring for an additional child and ensure the child's needs are met. Financial assistance can cover essential expenses such as food, clothing, education, and medical care.

Training and Support Services: Kinship caregivers may benefit from training and support services to help them navigate the child welfare system and address the specific needs of the children in their care. Training can include child development, behavior management, and navigating legal issues. Support services can include access to counseling, respite care, and peer support groups. These resources can help kinship caregivers feel more confident and capable in their caregiving roles.

Emotional Support: Caring for a relative's child can be emotionally draining. Access to counseling and mental health services can help kinship caregivers cope with the stress and emotional challenges of their responsibilities. Support groups and peer networks can also provide valuable emotional support and practical advice.

Policy Recommendations: Policymakers should consider the unique needs of kinship caregivers when designing child welfare programs and policies. This includes ensuring kinship caregivers access the same resources and support services as non-relative foster caregivers. Policies promoting kinship care and providing adequate support for kinship caregivers can help improve outcomes for children and families.

Conclusion

The advantages of kinship care over foster care are well-documented in the literature. From increased stability and continuity of relationships to better mental health and educational outcomes, kinship care provides a more favorable environment for many children needing out-of-home care. However, to fully realize these benefits, kinship caregivers must receive the necessary support and resources to meet their challenges. By investing in kinship care, child welfare systems can improve outcomes for children and create more stable, supportive environments that foster their development and well-being.

Kinship care is not only beneficial for the children but also for the overall foster care system. By leveraging the strengths of family networks, child welfare agencies can provide better care and support for all children in need. Ensuring that kinship caregivers have the resources and support they need is essential for the success of these placements. By addressing the challenges and providing adequate support, kinship care can continue to be a valuable and effective option for children who cannot remain with their biological parents. ◆

References:

1. Cuddeback, G. S. (2004). Kinship Family Foster Care: A Methodological and Substantive Synthesis of Research. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(7), 623–639.

2. Geen, R. (2003). Kinship Care: Making the Most of a Valuable Resource. The Urban Institute.

3. Gibbs, D., & Muller, K. (2000). Kinship Foster Care: What Works? What Does Not? Child Welfare League of America.

4. Pabustan-Claar, J. A. (2007). Kinship Care: A Review of Issues. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34(4), 133-155.

5. Rubin, D. M., Downes, K. J., O'Reilly, A. L., Mekonnen, R., Luan, X., & Localio, A. R. (2008). Impact of Kinship Care on Behavioral Well-being for Children in Out-of-Home Care. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 162(6), 550–556.

6. Testa, M. F. (2001). Kinship Care and Permanency. Journal of Social Service Research, 28(1), 25–43.

7. Winokur, M., Holtan, A., & Batchelder, K. E. (2014). Kinship Care for the Safety, Permanency, and Well-being of Children Removed from the Home for Maltreatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

8. Zinn, A., DeCoursey, J., Goerge, R. M., & Courtney, M. E. (2012). A Study of Placement Stability in Kinship and Non-Kinship Foster Care. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(3), 331–346.