Articles

Forensic Updates

From Birth to Behavior: Exploring the Connection Between Neonatal Brain Injuries and Autism

Dr. Sam Goldstein

Brain injuries at birth, often categorized under the term neonatal brain damage, can significantly affect a child's development and quality of life. These injuries can result from a variety of factors, including physical trauma, oxygen deprivation, and infections. To briefly review the main types of brain injury at birth include:

  • Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE): This type of injury occurs when the baby's brain does not receive enough oxygen. HIE can lead to cerebral palsy, developmental delays, and cognitive issues. It's one of the most severe forms of brain damage. It can result from complications during birth, such as umbilical cord problems or prolonged labor.
  • Cerebral Palsy (CP): While cerebral palsy can be caused by genetic abnormalities, it can also result from brain damage before, during, or shortly after birth. The condition affects muscle coordination and body movement. CP stemming from birth-related brain injury is often due to lack of oxygen, infection, or trauma.
  • Intracranial Hemorrhage: This term refers to bleeding within the brain, which can happen due to injury during birth or a rupture of blood vessels in the brain. Types of intracranial hemorrhages include subarachnoid, intraventricular, subdural, and epidural hemorrhages. Premature babies are particularly at risk due to their fragile blood vessels.
  • Periventricular Leukomalacia (PVL): PVL is characterized by the death of small areas of brain tissue around the ventricles, which can lead to the development of cerebral palsy. It's more common in premature infants and those who have experienced significant oxygen deprivation.
  • Neonatal Stroke: A stroke can occur when the blood supply to part of the baby's brain is interrupted or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts. Neonatal strokes can lead to lifelong issues such as cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and learning disabilities. Strokes in newborns can be caused by blood clots, placental disorders, or complications during delivery.

Each condition can have a wide range of outcomes, from mild effects that might improve over time to more severe impacts that cause atypical development and may require lifelong care. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial in managing and mitigating the effects of all brain injuries at birth.

The relationship between neonatal brain damage, such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) or periventricular hemorrhage (PVL) at birth, and the subsequent development of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in children is a complex and critically important area of study. This month’s article explores the occurrence of autism and autism symptoms in children following neonatal brain damage in conditions such as brain bleeds or HIE at birth, the potential causality between early brain injury and autism, and whether these children have better outcomes than older children after brain injury due to the plasticity of the young brain.

Early Brain Injury and Autism Spectrum Disorders

Several studies have investigated the link between HIE and other types of brain injury and the subsequent development of ASD. Glass et al. (2014), in their study published in the journal “Pediatrics,” found that children who suffered from moderate to severe HIE were at an increased risk of developing autism spectrum disorders. The research suggests a potential causal relationship between neonatal brain injury and the later development of autism, likely due to the damage to the brain’s structure and function early in life, which affects neurodevelopmental outcomes (Glass et al., 2014).

The Role of Brain Plasticity

Brain plasticity, or neuroplasticity, refers to the brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections throughout life. This ability is particularly pronounced in young children, whose brains are still developing and are more malleable than those of older individuals. The concept of neuroplasticity raises the question of whether children who suffer brain injuries at birth may have better outcomes than those who sustain them later in childhood due to the greater adaptability of their developing brains.

A study by Anderson et al. (2009) in the “Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry” found that children who sustained traumatic brain injuries early in life often exhibited remarkable recovery, suggesting that the young brain’s plasticity could mitigate some of the cognitive and developmental impacts of the injury. However, the study also highlighted that the extent of recovery varies widely among individuals, depending on the severity of the injury, the area of the brain affected, and the therapeutic interventions received (Anderson et al., 2009).

Early Intervention and Outcomes

The role of early intervention cannot be overstated in the context of children who have suffered HIE or other early brain injuries. Early and targeted therapeutic interventions can significantly influence the developmental trajectory of these children. Occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy, and behavioral interventions are among the strategies used to support children with developmental delays or ASD following early brain injury.

A systematic review by Novak et al. (2014) in the "Research in Developmental Disabilities" journal emphasized the positive impact of early interventions on children with cerebral palsy. This condition can result from HIE. The findings suggest that early, intensive interventions can improve motor function, cognitive development, and overall quality of life (Novak et al., 2014). Although the review focused on cerebral palsy, the principles of early intervention apply to children at risk of or diagnosed with ASD following early brain injury.

Forensic Neuropsychological Evaluation in Cases of Early Trauma

In forensic cases where children with neonatal brain injury subsequently develop ASD or other severe developmental disorders, apportioning causality requires a meticulous, multidisciplinary approach. First, it involves a comprehensive review of medical records, including prenatal care, birth history, neonatal health, and developmental milestones. Key to this process is distinguishing between congenital factors and those injuries or conditions acquired during birth. This differentiation is crucial, as it can significantly impact the determination of causality.

The opinions of treating medical experts in neurology, pediatrics, and speech pathology is indispensable. These specialists can provide insights into whether the developmental disorders observed are within the expected outcomes of the recorded neonatal brain injuries or if they could be attributed to other genetic, environmental, or postnatal factors. Genetic testing and neuroimaging studies further enrich the analysis by revealing underlying conditions or brain anomalies that might have contributed to the developmental outcomes observed.

Additionally, it's essential to consider the timing and nature of the symptom onset of the brain injury. The developmental trajectory following neonatal brain injury can offer clues about causal relationships. For example, certain types of brain damage have well-established links to specific developmental disorders.

Evaluating causality also requires critically examining the literature and identifying well-documented cases and research findings that support or refute potential causal links. Apportioning causality in such complex cases is a nuanced process that balances medical evidence, expert opinion, and a thorough understanding of the child's developmental path.

Conclusions

There is evidence to suggest that early brain injuries, such as those caused by HIE at birth, can increase the risk of developing ASD in children. The young brain's plasticity may offer a window of opportunity for significant recovery and improvement, highlighting the importance of early and intensive intervention. However, outcomes can vary widely, and ongoing research is critical to fully understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between early brain injury and ASD and to develop optimal intervention strategies. ◆

References

  • Atladottir, H. O., Schendel, D. E., Parner, E. T., Thorsen, P., & Mortensen, P. B. (2015). A descriptive study on the neonatal morbidity profile of autism spectrum disorders, including a comparison with other neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 45(8), 2429-42.
  • Anderson, V., et al. (2009). Predictors of cognitive function and recovery 10 years after traumatic brain injury in young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(4), 406-416.
  • Bokobza, C., Van Steenwinckel, J., Mani, S., Mezger, V., Fleiss, B., & Gressens, P. (2019). Neuroinflammation in preterm babies and autism spectrum disorders. Pediatric Research. 85(2), 165-185.
  • Chang, H. K., Hsu, J. W., Wu, J. C., Huang, K. L., Chang, H. F., Bai, Y. M., Chen, T. J., & Chen, M. H. (2018). Traumatic brain injury in early childhood and risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder: a nationwide longitudinal study. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 79(6), 11857.
  • Glass, H. C., et al. (2014). Autism spectrum disorder and cerebral palsy in children with neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics, 134(1), 48-55.
  • Hisle-Gorman, E., Susi, A., Stokes, T., Gorman, G., & Nylund, C. M. (2018). Prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal risk factors of autism spectrum disorder. Pediatric Research. 84(2), 190-198.
  • Novak, I., et al. (2014). Evidence-based diagnosis, health care, and rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Child Neurology, 29(8), 1141-1156.
  • Ure, A. M., Treyvaud, K., Thompson, D. K., Pascoe, L., Roberts, G., Lee, K. J., Seal, M. L., & Anderson, P. J. (2016). Neonatal brain abnormalities associated with autism spectrum disorder in children born very preterm. Autism Research. 9(5), 543-552.